Deployment
AgentBot units deployed into an existing high-bay warehouse operation, working against live WMS tasks alongside manual pickers and material handling equipment.
Validation
Evidence, with its definitions attached.
Every figure on this page states what was measured, on which site, over which period, and whether it comes from customer acceptance. Where documentation is not yet attached, it is marked as such.
Operational performance
Reported metrics and how each one is defined.
The values below are reported from a live production deployment. They are not aggregated across customers, and they are not extrapolated to other sites.
2,500+Operating hours
5,000+Industrial SKUs handled
0Recorded safety incidents
ProjectedPayback period
| Metric | Definition | Period | Object measured | Environment | Source | Acceptance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,500+ h | Cumulative continuous operating hours in production, excluding installation and commissioning | Since deployment | Deployed AgentBot units on site | Live production warehouse, EMS customer | Customer project records | To be attached |
| 5,000+ | Distinct material SKUs successfully picked and placed at least once in production | Since deployment | Material master data, not task count | Live production warehouse | WMS execution logs | To be attached |
| 0 | Safety incidents involving personnel injury or equipment damage attributable to robot operation | Since deployment | All deployed units on site | Live production warehouse | Customer EHS records | To be attached |
| 24 months | Customer-side payback estimate based on labor cost, throughput, and capex assumptions | Projection | Single-line business case | Modelled, not yet realised | Joint business case | Projection only |
Where a value has no acceptance document attached, it should be treated as reported rather than verified. Formal acceptance reports are shared with customers under NDA during technical evaluation.
Engineering case study
EMS & 3C electronics: Jabil production floor.
What was verified
Continuous operation in production, SKU coverage across mixed containers, and safe coexistence with personnel in a shared aisle environment.
What was engineered
Site survey, container profiling, WMS task integration, safety zone definition, FAT/SAT acceptance criteria, and operator training.
What is not claimed
Figures from this site are not presented as performance guarantees for other sites, other container mixes, or other production rhythms.
Evidence in preparation
What we are still documenting.
Customer acceptance reports
Signed FAT/SAT documents and EHS confirmation for the flagship deployment.
In preparation
Availability and reliability data
MTBF, MTTR, and availability measured over a defined operating window.
In preparation
Additional industry cases
Semiconductor and packaging deployments documented to the same standard as the EMS case.
In preparation
Start with a line assessment.
A structured assessment of your material flow, containers, systems, and safety constraints — with a written scope, acceptance criteria, and clear go/no-go.